On Jun 19, 2024, at 13:50, Jelte Fennema-Nio <m...@jeltef.nl> wrote: > This indeed does sound like the behaviour that pretty much every > existing extension wants to have. One small addition/clarification > that I would make to your definition: fully qualified references to > other objects should still be allowed.
Would be tricky for referring to objects from other extensions with no defined schema, or are relatable. > 1. To have a safe search_path that can be used in SET search_path on a > function (see also [1]). > 2. To make it easy for extension authors to avoid conflicts with other > extensions/UDFs. These would indeed be nice improvements IMO. Best, David
