Jelte Fennema-Nio <m...@jeltef.nl> writes:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 17:28, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a feeling that this might be pretty annoying to implement, and
>> if that is true, then never mind.
> Based on a quick look it's not trivial, but also not super bad.
> Basically it seems like in src/backend/catalog/namespace.c, every time
> we loop over activeSearchPath and CurrentExtensionObject is set, then
> we should skip any item that's not stored in pg_catalog, unless
> there's a DEPENDENCY_EXTENSION pg_depend entry for the item (and that
> pg_depend entry references the extension or the requires list).
We could change the lookup rules that apply during execution of
an extension script, but we already restrict search_path at that
time so I'm not sure how much further this'd move the goalposts.
The *real* problem IMO is that if you create a PL function or
(old-style) SQL function within an extension, execution of that
function is not similarly protected.
regards, tom lane
