On 6/15/23 2:47 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
Robert - can you please comment on what you are willing to commit in order to close out your open item here.  My take is that the design for this, the tabular form a couple of emails ago (copied here), is ready-to-commit, just needing the actual (trivial) code changes to be made to accomplish it.

Tabular form

     rolname      |     memberof     |       options       | grantor ------------------+------------------+---------------------+------------------ postgres         |                  |                     |  regress_du_admin | regress_du_role0+| admin, inherit, set+| postgres        +                  | regress_du_role1+| admin, inherit, set+| postgres        +                  | regress_du_role2 | admin, inherit, set | postgres regress_du_role0 |                  |                     |  regress_du_role1 | regress_du_role0+| admin, inherit, set+| regress_du_admin+                  | regress_du_role0+| inherit            +| regress_du_role1+                  | regress_du_role0 | set                 | regress_du_role2 regress_du_role2 | regress_du_role0+| admin              +| regress_du_admin+                  | regress_du_role0+| inherit, set       +| regress_du_role1+                  | regress_du_role0+| empty              +| regress_du_role2+                  | regress_du_role1 | admin, set          | regress_du_admin(5 rows)


[RMT hat]

Can we resolve this before Beta 2?[1] The RMT originally advised to try to resolve before Beta 1[2], and this seems to be lingering.

Thanks,

Jonathan

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/460ae02a-3123-16a3-f2d7-ccd79778819b%40postgresql.org [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d61db38b-29d9-81cc-55b3-8a5c704bb969%40postgresql.org

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to