On 5/3/23 12:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 9:00 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org>
wrote:
I don't see why this is an open item as this feature was not committed
for v16. Open items typically revolve around committed features.

The argument is that updating the psql \d views to show the newly added
options is something that the patch to add those options should have done
before being committed.

Yeah, if there is not any convenient way to see that info in psql
then that seems like a missing part of the feature.

[RMT hat]

OK -- I was rereading the thread again to see if I could glean that insight. There was a comment buried in the thread with David's opinion on that front, but no one had +1'd that.

However, if this is for feature completeness, I'll withdraw the closing of the open item, but would strongly suggest we complete it in time for Beta 1.

[Personal hat]

Looking at Pavel's latest patch, I do find the output easy to understand, though do we need to explicitly list "empty" if there are no membership permissions?

Thanks,

Jonathan

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to