"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:08 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> * I agree that the "tabular" format looks nicer and has fewer i18n
>> issues than the other proposals.
> As you are on board with a separate command please clarify whether you mean
> the tabular format but still with newlines, one row per grantee, or the
> table with one row per grantor-grantee pair.
I'd lean towards a straight table with a row per grantee/grantor.
I tend to think that faking table layout with some newlines is
a poor idea. I'm not dead set on that approach though.
regards, tom lane
