On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 02:09:26PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > > Additionally I noticed that the check: > > ``` > if (!process_shared_preload_libraries_in_progress) > return; > ``` > > ... was misplaced in _PG_init(). Here is the patch v2 which fixes this too.
I'm pretty sure that this is intentional. The worker can be launched dynamically and in that case it still needs a GUC for the naptime.
