On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 07:58:02PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > That being said, I still don't understand why you focus on this tiny and not > really important detail while the module itself is actually broken (for > dynamic > bgworker without s_p_l) and also has some broken behaviors with regards to the > naptime that are way more likely to hurt third party code that was written > using this module as an example.
Are you or Aleksander interested in helping improve this module? I'm happy to help review and/or write patches. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
