On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 9:27 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2022-10-06 16:43:43 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2022-10-06 14:10:56 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:31:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > > I am not against backpatching this but OTOH it doesn't appear critical > > > > enough to block one's work, so not backpatching should be fine. > > > > > > We are just talking about the reset timestamp not being set at > > > when the object is created, right? This does not strike me as > > > critical, so applying it only on HEAD is fine IMO. A few months ago, > > > while in beta, I would have been fine with something applied to > > > REL_15_STABLE. Now that we are in RC, that's not worth taking a risk > > > in my opinion. > > > > Agreed. > > > > > Amit or Andres, are you planning to double-check and perhaps merge > > > this patch to take care of the inconsistency? > > > > I'll run it through CI and then to master unless somebody pipes up in the > > meantime. > > And pushed. Thanks all!
Thanks! Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
