On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:31:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > I am not against backpatching this but OTOH it doesn't appear critical > enough to block one's work, so not backpatching should be fine.
We are just talking about the reset timestamp not being set at when the object is created, right? This does not strike me as critical, so applying it only on HEAD is fine IMO. A few months ago, while in beta, I would have been fine with something applied to REL_15_STABLE. Now that we are in RC, that's not worth taking a risk in my opinion. Amit or Andres, are you planning to double-check and perhaps merge this patch to take care of the inconsistency? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
