On 2022-10-06 16:43:43 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2022-10-06 14:10:56 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:31:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > I am not against backpatching this but OTOH it doesn't appear critical > > > enough to block one's work, so not backpatching should be fine. > > > > We are just talking about the reset timestamp not being set at > > when the object is created, right? This does not strike me as > > critical, so applying it only on HEAD is fine IMO. A few months ago, > > while in beta, I would have been fine with something applied to > > REL_15_STABLE. Now that we are in RC, that's not worth taking a risk > > in my opinion. > > Agreed. > > > Amit or Andres, are you planning to double-check and perhaps merge > > this patch to take care of the inconsistency? > > I'll run it through CI and then to master unless somebody pipes up in the > meantime.
And pushed. Thanks all!
