On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:25 AM Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I don't see a reason to back-patch a change like this > > Maybe we should consider backporting at least 0001 patch, partially > perhaps? I believe if fixes pretty cursed pieces of code, e.g: > > ``` > pg_cryptohash_ctx *context = > - (pg_cryptohash_ctx *) PointerGetDatum(foundres); > + (pg_cryptohash_ctx *) DatumGetPointer(foundres); > ```
Sure, back-porting the bug fixes would make sense to me. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
