Hi Peter, > > 3. Go with your patch and just fix up the warnings about uninitialized > > variables. But that seems the least principled to me. > > IMO the 3rd option is the lesser evil. Initializing four bools/ints in > order to make Clang 11 happy doesn't strike me as such a big deal. At > least until somebody reports a bottleneck for this particular reason. > We can optimize the code when and if this will happen.
Since the first patch was applied, cfbot now complains that it can't apply the patchset. Here is the rebased version. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
v5-0001-Convert-GetDatum-and-DatumGet-macros-to-inline-fu.patch
Description: Binary data