Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > ... if > we want to regard no-superusers as a supported configuration, we > probably need to tighten that up. I think it's kind of hopeless,
Yeah, I agree. At least, I'm uninterested in spending any of my
own time trying to make that usefully-more-secure than it is today.
If somebody else is interested enough to do the legwork, we can
look at what they come up with.
regards, tom lane
