"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 9:28 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> True, but what if the idea is to have *no* superusers? I seem
>> to recall people being interested in setups like that.
> I would expect an initdb option (once this is possible) to specify this
> desire and we just never set one up in the first place. It seems
> impractical to remove one after it already exists.
There has to be a role that owns the built-in objects. Robert's point
is that pretending that that role isn't high-privilege is silly.
regards, tom lane
