On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 5:50 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > +1 for pg_checkpoint on that -- let's not make it longer than necessary. > > > > And yes, +1 for actually changing it. It's a lot cheaper to change it now > > than it will be in the future. Yes, it would've been even cheaper to have > > already changed it, but we can't go back in time... > > Yeah, pg_checkpoint seems like the obvious alternative to pg_checkpointer. > I didn't see a patch in this thread yet, so I've put one together. I did > not include the catversion bump.
Hearing several votes in favor and none opposed, committed and back-patched to v15. I added the catversion bump, but left out the .po file changes, figuring it was better to let those files get updated via the normal process. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
