On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 08:57:04AM -0400, Isaac Morland wrote: > I was going to point out that pg_database_owner is the same way, but it is > fundamentally different in that it has no special allowed access and is > meant to be the target of permission grants rather than being granted to > other roles. > > +1 to rename it to pg_checkpoint or to some similar name.
We are still in beta, so, FWIW, I am fine to adjust this name even if it means an extra catversion bump. "checkpoint" is not a verb (right?), so would something like "pg_perform_checkpoint" rather than "pg_checkpoint" fit better in the larger picture? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
