On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 12:42, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes: > > I've adjusted the patch to use the wording proposed by Alvaro. See attached. > > Should we also change the adjacent item to "columns in a table", > for consistency of wording? Not sure though, because s/per/in a/ > throughout the list doesn't seem like it'd be an improvement.
I might agree if there weren't so many other "per"s in the list. Maybe "columns per result set" would have been a better title for consistency. David
