On Tue, 31 May 2022 at 20:33, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 07:08, Dave Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 31 May 2022 at 14:51, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> > >> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > >> > I think it's reasonable to have two adjacent rows in the table for > these > >> > two closely related things, but rather than "columns per tuple" I > would > >> > label the second one "columns in a result set". This is easy enough > to > >> > understand and to differentiate from the other limit. > >> > >> OK, with that wording it's probably clear enough. > > > Reworded patch attached > > I see the patch does not have the same text as what was proposed and > seconded above. My personal preferences would be "result set > columns", but "columns in a result set" seems fine too. > > I've adjusted the patch to use the wording proposed by Alvaro. See > attached. > > I will push this shortly. > > David > Thanks David, Apparently I am truly unable to multi-task. Dave
