On Tue, 31 May 2022 at 14:51, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > I think it's reasonable to have two adjacent rows in the table for these > > two closely related things, but rather than "columns per tuple" I would > > label the second one "columns in a result set". This is easy enough to > > understand and to differentiate from the other limit. > > OK, with that wording it's probably clear enough. > > regards, tom lane > > Reworded patch attached
columns_per_tuple.patch
Description: Binary data
