On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 3:08 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:06 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 3. doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
> >
> > +      <para>
> > +       If true, the subscription will request that the publisher send 
> > locally
> > +       originated changes. False indicates that the publisher sends any 
> > changes
> > +       regardless of their origin.
> > +      </para></entry>
> >
> > SUGGESTION
> > If true, the subscription will request the publisher to only send
> > changes that originated locally.
> >
> > ~~~
> >
>
> I think it is a good idea to keep the description related to the
> 'False' value as without that it is slightly unclear.
>
> > 4. doc/src/sgml/ref/create_subscription.sgml
> >
> > +         <para>
> > +          Specifies whether the subscription will request the publisher to 
> > send
> > +          locally originated changes at the publisher node, or send any
> > +          publisher node changes regardless of their origin. The default is
> > +          <literal>false</literal>.
> > +         </para>
> >
> > This wording should be more similar to the same information in catalogs.sgml
> >
> > SUGGESTION
> > Specifies whether the subscription will request the publisher to only
> > send changes that originated locally, or to send any changes
> > regardless of origin.
> >
> > ~~~
> >
>
> Here, also, let's keep the wording related to the default value.
>
> --

I agree. Probably I was not being clear enough with those review comments.

My suggestions were only meant as substitutes for the FIRST sentences
of those patch fragments, not the entire paragraph.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia


Reply via email to