Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Apr 4, 2022, at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Perhaps libpq should be trying harder to make those cases look alike, but
>> this test is about server behavior not libpq behavior, so I'm inclined
>> to just make it lax.
> +1.
> I've gotten this test failure only a few times in perhaps the last six
> months, so if we narrow the opportunity for test failure without closing it
> entirely, we're just making the test failures that much harder to diagnose.
Done that way.
regards, tom lane
