On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:14 PM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 15 Nov 2021, at 09:15, Peter Eisentraut > > <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > I think this is not an improvement. It loses the ability of the caller the > > specify exactly why a relation is not acceptable. > > > Agreed.
+1. > > I think a separate errdetail_relpersistence_not_supported() would be a > > better > > solution (assuming there are enough callers to make it worth a separate > > function). > > > I still think that the v8 patch posted earlier is the better option, which > increase granularity of error reporting with a small code footprint. Thanks. Attaching the v8 here again. Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
v8-0001-Improve-publication-error-messages.patch
Description: Binary data
