> On 15 Nov 2021, at 09:15, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I think this is not an improvement. It loses the ability of the caller the > specify exactly why a relation is not acceptable. Agreed. > I think a separate errdetail_relpersistence_not_supported() would be a better > solution (assuming there are enough callers to make it worth a separate > function). I still think that the v8 patch posted earlier is the better option, which increase granularity of error reporting with a small code footprint. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
