On 3/11/18 12:07, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I think it's worth mentioning in the docs around "it's now considered > insecure" that it's still an option to use if compression is the main > thing one is looking for, rather than security. As in, it doesn't make > it any less secure than no ssl at all. (obviously not those words) > > +1 otherwise.
committed like that -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
