On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Thanks. I think now we can proceed with >>>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix >>>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash >>>> nodes. >>> >>> Committed and back-patched to v10. >> >> Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to >> v9.6. I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and >> the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off' >> option for Explain. > > This thread got lost in my inbox over Christmas, but I've now > committed this back-port to REL9_6_STABLE. >
Thanks! -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
