On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks.  I think now we can proceed with
>>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
>>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
>>> nodes.
>>
>> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>
> Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to
> v9.6.  I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and
> the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off'
> option for Explain.

This thread got lost in my inbox over Christmas, but I've now
committed this back-port to REL9_6_STABLE.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Reply via email to