On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Uh, should I just revert that commit entirely first, and then we can >>> commit the new fix afterward? >> >> Yes. I have already extracted the test case of that commit to the new >> patch which is what we need from that commit. > > OK, done. >
Thanks. I think now we can proceed with fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash nodes. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
