Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The thing that makes me uncomfortable about this is that we used to have a
>> catcache size limitation mechanism, and ripped it out because it had too
>> much overhead (see commit 8b9bc234a).  I'm not sure how we can avoid that
>> problem within a fresh implementation.

> At the risk of beating a dead horse, I still think that the amount of
> wall clock time that has elapsed since an entry was last accessed is
> very relevant.

While I don't object to that statement, I'm not sure how it helps us
here.  If we couldn't afford DLMoveToFront(), doing a gettimeofday()
during each syscache access is surely right out.

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to