On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> I'm not sure we should regard very quick bloating as a problem in need >> of solving. Doesn't that just mean we need the cache to be bigger, at >> least temporarily? > > Leaving that aside, is that actually not at least to a good degree, > solved by that problem? By bumping the generation on hash resize, we > have recency information we can take into account.
I agree that we can do it. I'm just not totally sure it's a good idea. I'm also not totally sure it's a bad idea, either. That's why I asked the question. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
