On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI >> <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> This is a rebased version of the patch. >> >> As far as I can see, the patch still applies, compiles, and got no >> reviews. So moved to next CF. > > I think we have to mark this as returned with feedback or rejected for > the reasons mentioned here: > > http://postgr.es/m/ca+tgmozjn28uyjrq2k+5idhyxwbder68sctoc2p_nw7h7jb...@mail.gmail.com
Good point. I forgot this bit. Thanks for mentioning it I am switching the patch as returned with feedback. -- Michael
