On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:59:10AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Replication for PostgreSQL has been available, and in production use, for > at least two years now ... the .ORG registry is using eRServer ... there > was also a patch for contrib/rserv submit'd just the other week to make it > multi-slave ... there is also pgreplication (on gborg) and dbmirror ... > all of which have been around for ages now ...
To be fair, none of these has had much attention. Wide deployment is still the best evidence of full testing, and I don't know that _any_ of the replication systems for PostgreSQL have been installed and used under a wide variety of circumstances. The lack of a real, built-in replication system in Postgres is a fundamental problem, and therefore the sort of thing that people justifiably point to as a missing feature. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org