Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Reflecting on the bigger picture ... I would imagine that the vast
>> majority of existing applications depend on client_encoding settings
>> that come from postgresql.conf, ALTER USER SET, ALTER DATABASE SET, or
>> just the default (== database encoding). I don't think a solution that
>> penalizes those cases and makes only the case of setting it via
>> PGCLIENTENCODING work nicely is going to make very many people happy.
> I don't have any survey data available, but I think this assessment is
> semantically wrong. Usefully, the client encoding can come only from
> the client, or be defaulted (and even that is semantically wrong).
In an ideal world, perhaps so, but do you deny my point that that's not
reality?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
