On 24/apr/08, at 22:15, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
Or, here's another way to look at it ... make it easier to
modify ENUM datatypes because we all know that you will
eventually need that feature whether you males, females, and
unknowns think so or not.
+1
Added to TODO:
* Allow adding enumerated values to an existing enumerated data
type
And removing values if possible (fail if values are in use?).
And reorder them, too.
--
Giorgio Valoti
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
