Bruce Momjian wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
Or, here's another way to look at it ... make it easier to modify ENUM
datatypes because we all know that you will eventually need that
feature whether you males, females, and unknowns think so or not.
+1
Added to TODO:
* Allow adding enumerated values to an existing enumerated data
type
And removing values if possible (fail if values are in use?).
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
