D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I don't think it's odd at all. In my view, the people who think
enums are a
good datatype for databases are exactly the sorts who'd think that their
data is as static as this poor understanding of the vagaries of
individuals'
sex (gender is a different problem, given its association with social
roles)
would suggest.
Or, here's another way to look at it ... make it easier to modify ENUM
datatypes because we all know that you will eventually need that
feature whether you males, females, and unknowns think so or not.
+1
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
