On 3/21/20 12:02 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
On Mar 21, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 3/20/20 8:13 PM, pabloa98 wrote:
Nothing I saw that said int could not become bigint.
My bad. The code cannot be a bigint. Or it could be a bigint between 1 to
99999999 :)
Aah, that was the counter Peter was talking about. I missed that.
As to below that is going to require more thought.
Still no word on the actual requirement. As someone who believes consecutive
numbers on digital invoices is simply a mistaken interpretation of the paper
based system, I suspect a similar error here. But again we haven’t really
heard, far as I know. Something really fishy about 99999999.
Why? "Print" and "screen" forms have all sorts of practical restrictions
like this.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
