> On Mar 21, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
> 
> On 3/20/20 8:13 PM, pabloa98 wrote:
>>    Nothing I saw that said int could not become bigint.
>> My bad. The code cannot be a bigint. Or it could be a bigint between 1 to 
>> 99999999 :)
> 
> 
> Aah, that was the counter Peter was talking about. I missed that.
> 
> As to below that is going to require more thought.
> 
Still no word on the actual requirement. As someone who believes consecutive 
numbers on digital invoices is simply a mistaken interpretation of the paper 
based system, I suspect a similar error here. But again we haven’t really 
heard, far as I know. Something really fishy about 99999999. 
> 


Reply via email to