On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Patch along these lines attached. > > Frankly, I find this quite ugly, and much prefer the general approach of > your previous patch in <banlktim433vf5hwjbj0fswm_-xa8dda...@mail.gmail.com>. > > However, I don't like where you put the execution-time test there. I'd > put it in ExecOpenScanRelation instead, so that it covers both seqscan > and indexscan accesses.
Ah, OK. I was wondering if there was a better place. I'll do it that way, then. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
