Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Patch along these lines attached.
Frankly, I find this quite ugly, and much prefer the general approach of
your previous patch in <banlktim433vf5hwjbj0fswm_-xa8dda...@mail.gmail.com>.
However, I don't like where you put the execution-time test there. I'd
put it in ExecOpenScanRelation instead, so that it covers both seqscan
and indexscan accesses.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
