2009/10/25 Timothy Madden <terminato...@gmail.com>: > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Timothy Madden <terminato...@gmail.com> writes: >> > Ok I get it. So Posgres also offers perl and python in addition to SQL. >> > But at least for SQL, which is included and defined in the standard, >> > could >> > the syntax be made conforming ? >> >> I think you still haven't got the point: there is *no* function language >> that we offer that exactly matches what the spec has got. Not using >> string-literal syntax, difficult as that is already, would probably >> represent about 1% of the work needed to implement what the spec >> suggests. > > > I would like to put to good use the statements and expression that do match > (SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/ ...), and the very function declaration syntax is > getting in the way, making even those matches now useless ...
??? Pavel > > Thank you, > Timothy Madden > -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
