Timothy Madden <terminato...@gmail.com> writes:
> Ok I get it. So Posgres also offers perl and python in addition to SQL.
> But at least for SQL, which is included and defined in the standard, could
> the syntax be made conforming ?
I think you still haven't got the point: there is *no* function language
that we offer that exactly matches what the spec has got. Not using
string-literal syntax, difficult as that is already, would probably
represent about 1% of the work needed to implement what the spec
suggests.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
