On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On lör, 2009-10-24 at 14:01 +0000, Timothy Madden wrote: > > Can the string literal syntax for CREATE FUNCTION please, please be > dropped > > ... ? > [...] > > It is not ANSI/ISO and so annoying for compatibility. > > Whatever is inside the string literal is also not ANSI/ISO, so why would > it make a difference? > > At least the function declaration syntax would be right. I think it would be an important difference; this string literal idea is so strange and unnatural ... And why the function body would not be standard ? Do you mean it can never be for some reason ? How about a simple function ? Thank you, Timothy Madden
