Tom Lane wrote:
This could be addressed by having the postmaster report its $PGDATA value in the pg_ping response, but I would be against that on security grounds. We don't let nonprivileged users know where PGDATA is, why would we make the information available without any authentication at all?
Maybe a hash of it? -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
