Kevin Grittner wrote: > This seems likely to overlap the review I was soon going to do of the > differences between pg_ctl behavior and what is required for LSB > conformance. I'll make sure to test this behavior along with others. > One of my current complaints is that pg_ctl doesn't wait until it is > actually ready to receive connections before returning an indication > of success.
Maybe write the file as postmaster.ports.starting or some such and rename it to its final name when recovery has finished? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
