"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Sounds good to me, other than it stalls pg_ctl revamp until pg_ping is
> done. I don't remember a clear design of what pg_ping should look
> like. Does anyone have a clear plan in their head?
I don't think anyone's written down a full spec, but it seems like a
relatively trivial thing to me.
* Client connects to the usual place and sends a packet that has a
special "protocol number" (similar to the way we handle SSL requests).
AFAICS there wouldn't need to be anything else in the packet.
* Postmaster responds with a suitable message and closes the connection.
The message should at least include the current postmaster
CanAcceptConnections status and the PID/magic number we were just
discussing. I can't think of anything else offhand --- anyone else?
I'm not sure whether we'd want to provide a function within libpq
for this, or just code it in pg_ctl. Within libpq the natural
thing would be to take a conninfo connection string, but I'm not
sure that suits pg_ctl's purposes.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
