Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> Lars Kanis wrote: >>> Maybe version 2 (my initial patch) could be an alternative ? > >> Well, based on the "we don't know which different versions of openssl >> it'll break with", version 2 is no better than version 3 :( > > Yeah, if we do anything I think it should be more like #3. > > I think all or most back releases of openssl are available from > openssl.org. If someone had time to do a test compile of the proposed > patch against all of 'em (or at least all the ones we still claim to > support), it would salve my worries at least a bit. I'm not sure if > that's a big task or not, though.
Well, if it's just to compile it, I guess it should even be scriptable :-) I'm not going to volunteer for that myself since I'm not sure I'll have the time. I can try to, but it's better if someone else has the time. -- Magnus Hagander Self: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
