Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On 22 jun 2009, at 17.46, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> It seems like there is large potential for failure in
>> contexts other than the one or two you are going to be able to test
>> right now. Is there anything that can be done to reduce the risk?
> I share your concerns in general. But I think we nee to take into
> account that this simply does not work without the patch.
Frankly, I don't much care whether openssl-with-an-external-engine
works; we never supported that before, and if it doesn't work now,
that's not a regression. What I'm worried about at this stage of the
release cycle is regressions, eg, does the code still compile at all
with openssl version 0.9.random-version-that-used-to-work.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
