Hi Dave,
Le 2021-11-15 à 05:37, Dave Page a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:31 PM Philippe Cloutier <chea...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Le 2021-11-10 à 04:06, Dave Page a écrit :
Hi
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:23 PM Philippe Cloutier
<chea...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
The ticket I filed was set to Status "Rejected". Could
someone either explain why or set that field to a more
representative value?
Because at the time we had no plan to change tracker. Or are you
talking about a different ticket?
No, I am talking about #5042. I would obviously prefer if it had
been solved yesterday, but it does not mention any timeframe. It
is simply a report of the issue (and implicitly, a request to
solve it as soon as possible).
Right, so it is the same ticket. We don't have any definitive plans to
change the tracker at the moment. As I mentioned, we are considering
Github, but that is by no means decided, and we may well leave things
as they are. It's also not a pgAdmin feature, which is another reason
why the issue was rejected; the issue tracker is for tracking
features/bugs in pgAdmin itself; we don't keep any infrastructure
related issues there.
You are correct that this is not an issue in the pgAdmin product.
However, the Redmine instance tracks issues in *projects* (as can be
seen in the screenshot). If it really tracks issues in products, the
instance should be adjusted accordingly.
For sure, the project is *not* just for tracking features and bugs in
pgAdmin itself. There is even a tracker dedicated to support requests,
so it would be hard to imagine that project issues would not be tracked
when even support requests are.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:20 AM Philippe Cloutier
<chea...@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
After starting to use pgAdmin a couple years ago and
struggling to track one of its issues, I figured out
that its issue tracker was not publicly visible (an
account is required to display tickets). I reported that
meta-issue in report #5042.
The ticket's Status field was later set to Rejected. In
August, I asked in that ticket if there was a reason for
that.
In September, as there had been no answer, I
specifically asked Dave Page, who is responsible for the
field's change, if he could explain it. Unfortunately,
more than a month later, that question remains
unanswered, as can be seen in the following screenshot:
I am therefore resorting to this forum to request help
from the pgAdmin community. Can someone either solve
that or at least help elucidate? A quick look indicates
that Mr Page still contributes to pgAdmin.
Thanks in advance
--
Philippe Cloutier
http://www.philippecloutier.com
--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Philippe Cloutier
http://www.philippecloutier.com
--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Philippe Cloutier
http://www.philippecloutier.com
--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Philippe Cloutier
http://www.philippecloutier.com
