On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:31 PM Philippe Cloutier <chea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 2021-11-10 à 04:06, Dave Page a écrit : > > Hi > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:23 PM Philippe Cloutier <chea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> [...] >> > >> The ticket I filed was set to Status "Rejected". Could someone either >> explain why or set that field to a more representative value? >> > Because at the time we had no plan to change tracker. Or are you talking > about a different ticket? > > > No, I am talking about #5042. I would obviously prefer if it had been > solved yesterday, but it does not mention any timeframe. It is simply a > report of the issue (and implicitly, a request to solve it as soon as > possible). > Right, so it is the same ticket. We don't have any definitive plans to change the tracker at the moment. As I mentioned, we are considering Github, but that is by no means decided, and we may well leave things as they are. It's also not a pgAdmin feature, which is another reason why the issue was rejected; the issue tracker is for tracking features/bugs in pgAdmin itself; we don't keep any infrastructure related issues there. > > > > >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:20 AM Philippe Cloutier <chea...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> After starting to use pgAdmin a couple years ago and struggling to track >>> one of its issues, I figured out that its issue tracker was not publicly >>> visible (an account is required to display tickets). I reported that >>> meta-issue in report #5042. >>> >>> The ticket's Status field was later set to Rejected. In August, I asked >>> in that ticket if there was a reason for that. >>> >>> In September, as there had been no answer, I specifically asked Dave >>> Page, who is responsible for the field's change, if he could explain it. >>> Unfortunately, more than a month later, that question remains unanswered, >>> as can be seen in the following screenshot: >>> >>> I am therefore resorting to this forum to request help from the pgAdmin >>> community. Can someone either solve that or at least help elucidate? A >>> quick look indicates that Mr Page still contributes to pgAdmin. >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> -- >>> Philippe Cloutierhttp://www.philippecloutier.com >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Dave Page >> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com >> Twitter: @pgsnake >> >> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com >> >> -- >> Philippe Cloutierhttp://www.philippecloutier.com >> >> > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com > > -- > Philippe Cloutierhttp://www.philippecloutier.com > > -- Dave Page Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
