I second KVM.  I've been running it on Ubuntu Lucid with LVM managing
storage for about a year now and it has worked very well for me.  When
I've needed them, I've even had assorted versions of Windows and MS-DOS
running on it.  However, I can't comment on native Linux GUI management
tools, because I'm happy with virsh on the command line.

Tony Cowderoy

On 02/10/2012 06:07, Richard Forth wrote:
>
> Have you looked at RedHat's KVM hypervisor? You should be able to get
> it with Red Hat or its many variants like Scientific Linux. Just
> install base OS and the Virtualization software group. Launch the
> Manager with 'virt-manager'. The cool thing about KVM is that it's
> part of the kernel.
>
> Rich
> Now proud owner of RHCSA certificate.
>
> On Oct 1, 2012 2:23 PM, "Mark Rogers" <m...@quarella.co.uk
> <mailto:m...@quarella.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>     I have a couple of Fujitsu Siemens Econel 100's that have failed.
>     They're good solid boxes but I think the problem is on the
>     motherboard.
>
>     So I'm looking to replace the motherboard with something that will
>     play nicely with VMWare vSphere, but as this is just a "play
>     thing" I can't afford the luxury of looking at the hardware that
>     VMWare support.
>
>     What I think I need is (a) a CPU which supports virtualisation
>     (don't they all these days?), (b) onboard network and graphics
>     that vSphere will support, (c) onboard RAID that vSphere will
>     recognise (I have an IDE boot drive and 4x SATA HDD for my virtual
>     machines; RAID 10 would suffice as it's better performance than
>     RAID5).
>
>     I have a working Econel 100 that I've got up and running which is
>     working OK but fails on (a) (it's an old 3GHz Pentium D), and I'm
>     guessing fails on (c) as although I have a RAID10 array set up I
>     can't see it in vSphere, just the four individual drives. This is
>     the first time I've looked at vSphere so (c) could be human error.
>
>     I'm keen to get vSphere up and running as I already have several
>     virtual Linux boxes running but using an Ubuntu/VirualBox host
>     which is an overhead I could do without, and vSphere seems more
>     "grown up" (albeit without a native linux admin client, grrr!)
>
>     Mark
>
>     -- 
>     Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844
>     251 1450
>     Registered in England (0456 0902) 21 Drakes Mews, Milton Keynes,
>     MK8 0ER
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Peterboro mailing list
>     Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk>
>     https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peterboro mailing list
> Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

Reply via email to